0.08/0.09	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.08/0.11	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.10/0.31	% Computer   : n025.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 120
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 12:04:27 EDT 2021
0.10/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.31	% Number of cores: 8
0.16/0.32	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.16/0.32	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.16/0.32	# No SInE strategy applied
0.16/0.32	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
59.11/59.45	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
59.11/59.45	# and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
59.11/59.45	#
59.11/59.45	# Preprocessing time       : 0.062 s
59.27/59.62	# No success with AutoSched0
59.27/59.62	# Trying AutoSched1 for 26 seconds
59.32/59.78	# AutoSched1-Mode selected heuristic G_E___008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
59.32/59.78	# and selection function SelectNewComplexAHPNS.
59.32/59.78	#
59.32/59.78	# Preprocessing time       : 0.060 s
59.32/59.78	
59.32/59.78	# Proof found!
59.32/59.78	# SZS status Theorem
59.32/59.78	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
59.32/59.78	thf(def_d_not, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_not)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_imp, axiom, (imp)=(^[X34:$o, X35:$o]:(X34=>X35)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_imp)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_l_ec, axiom, (l_ec)=(^[X38:$o, X39:$o]:(X38=>(X39=>~$true))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_ec)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_all_of, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_all_of)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_is_of, axiom, (is_of)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:X2 @ X1), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_is_of)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_non, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_non)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_d_and, axiom, (d_and)=(^[X40:$o, X41:$o]:((X40=>(X41=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_d_and)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_l_some, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X398:$i]:(in @ X398 @ X1=>(X2 @ X398=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_some)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_n_is, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X474:$i, X475:$i]:(X474)=(X475)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_is)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_e_is, axiom, (e_is)=(^[X1:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i]:(X60)=(X61)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_e_is)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_l_or, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X393:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X393)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_l_or)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_and3, axiom, (and3)=(^[X51:$o, X52:$o, X53:$o]:((X51=>(((X52=>(X53=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_and3)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_n_some, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X476:$i > $o]:(![X477:$i]:(in @ X477 @ nat=>(X476 @ X477=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_n_some)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_diffprop, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_diffprop)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_or3, axiom, (or3)=(^[X48:$o, X49:$o, X50:$o]:((X48=>~$true)=>((X49=>~$true)=>X50))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_or3)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_ec3, axiom, (ec3)=(^[X54:$o, X55:$o, X56:$o]:(((X54=>(X55=>~$true))=>((((X55=>(X56=>~$true))=>((X56=>(X54=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_ec3)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_d_29_ii, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X498:$i]:(in @ X498 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X498)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_d_29_ii)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_orec3, axiom, (orec3)=(^[X57:$o, X58:$o, X59:$o]:((((X57=>~$true)=>((X58=>~$true)=>X59))=>((((X57=>(X58=>~$true))=>((((X58=>(X59=>~$true))=>((X59=>(X57=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM007^0.ax', def_orec3)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_iii, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X501:$i]:(in @ X501 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X501)=>~$true))=>~$true)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_iii)).
59.32/59.78	thf(def_moreis, axiom, (moreis)=(^[X1:$i, X187:$i]:(((![X505:$i]:(in @ X505 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X187 @ X505)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X187))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', def_moreis)).
59.32/59.78	thf(satz9, axiom, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ nat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X199:$i]:in @ X199 @ nat) @ (^[X200:$i]:orec3 @ (n_is @ X1 @ X200) @ (n_some @ (^[X4:$i]:n_is @ X1 @ (n_pl @ X200 @ X4))) @ (n_some @ (^[X4:$i]:n_is @ X200 @ (n_pl @ X1 @ X4))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz9)).
59.32/59.78	thf(satz10j, conjecture, all_of @ (^[X1:$i]:in @ X1 @ nat) @ (^[X1:$i]:all_of @ (^[X231:$i]:in @ X231 @ nat) @ (^[X232:$i]:(d_not @ (moreis @ X1 @ X232)=>iii @ X1 @ X232))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', satz10j)).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_22, axiom, (d_not)=(^[X36:$o]:(X36=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_not, def_imp])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_23, axiom, (l_ec)=(^[X38:$o, X39:$o]:(X38=>(X39=>~$true))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_ec, def_imp]), c_0_22])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_24, axiom, (all_of)=(^[X3:$i > $o, X2:$i > $o]:![X4:$i]:(X3 @ X4=>X2 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_all_of, def_is_of])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_25, axiom, (non)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X4:$i]:(X2 @ X4=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_non, c_0_22])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_26, axiom, (d_and)=(^[X40:$o, X41:$o]:((X40=>(X41=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_and, c_0_22]), c_0_23])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_27, axiom, (l_some)=(^[X1:$i, X2:$i > $o]:(![X398:$i]:(in @ X398 @ X1=>(X2 @ X398=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_some, c_0_24]), c_0_22]), c_0_25])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_28, axiom, (n_is)=(^[X474:$i, X475:$i]:(X474)=(X475)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_is, def_e_is])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_29, axiom, (l_or)=(^[X42:$o, X393:$o]:((X42=>~$true)=>X393)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_l_or, def_imp]), c_0_22])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_30, axiom, (and3)=(^[X51:$o, X52:$o, X53:$o]:((X51=>(((X52=>(X53=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_and3, c_0_26])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_31, axiom, (n_some)=(^[X476:$i > $o]:(![X477:$i]:(in @ X477 @ nat=>(X476 @ X477=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_n_some, c_0_27])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_32, axiom, (diffprop)=(^[X1:$i, X183:$i, X4:$i]:(X1)=(n_pl @ X183 @ X4)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_diffprop, c_0_28])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_33, axiom, (or3)=(^[X48:$o, X49:$o, X50:$o]:((X48=>~$true)=>((X49=>~$true)=>X50))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_or3, c_0_29])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_34, axiom, (ec3)=(^[X54:$o, X55:$o, X56:$o]:(((X54=>(X55=>~$true))=>((((X55=>(X56=>~$true))=>((X56=>(X54=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_ec3, c_0_23]), c_0_30])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_35, axiom, (d_29_ii)=(^[X1:$i, X184:$i]:(![X498:$i]:(in @ X498 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X184 @ X498)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_d_29_ii, c_0_31]), c_0_32])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_36, axiom, (orec3)=(^[X57:$o, X58:$o, X59:$o]:((((X57=>~$true)=>((X58=>~$true)=>X59))=>((((X57=>(X58=>~$true))=>((((X58=>(X59=>~$true))=>((X59=>(X57=>~$true))=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_orec3, c_0_26]), c_0_33]), c_0_34])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_37, plain, ![X751:$i, X761:$i]:(epred18_2 @ X761 @ X751<=>~((((X751)!=(X761)=>(![X762:$i]:(in @ X762 @ nat=>(X751)!=(n_pl @ X761 @ X762))=>~(![X763:$i]:(in @ X763 @ nat=>(X761)!=(n_pl @ X751 @ X763)))))=>(((X751)=(X761)=>![X764:$i]:(in @ X764 @ nat=>(X751)!=(n_pl @ X761 @ X764)))=>((~(![X765:$i]:(in @ X765 @ nat=>(X751)!=(n_pl @ X761 @ X765)))=>![X766:$i]:(in @ X766 @ nat=>(X761)!=(n_pl @ X751 @ X766)))=>~((~(![X767:$i]:(in @ X767 @ nat=>(X761)!=(n_pl @ X751 @ X767)))=>(X751)!=(X761)))))))), introduced(definition)).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_38, axiom, (iii)=(^[X1:$i, X185:$i]:(![X501:$i]:(in @ X501 @ nat=>((X185)=(n_pl @ X1 @ X501)=>~$true))=>~$true)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_iii, c_0_31]), c_0_32])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_39, axiom, (moreis)=(^[X1:$i, X187:$i]:(((![X505:$i]:(in @ X505 @ nat=>((X1)=(n_pl @ X187 @ X505)=>~$true))=>~$true)=>~$true)=>(X1)=(X187))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[def_moreis, c_0_29]), c_0_28]), c_0_35])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_40, plain, ![X751:$i]:(in @ X751 @ nat=>![X761:$i]:(in @ X761 @ nat=>epred18_2 @ X761 @ X751)), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[satz9, c_0_24]), c_0_36]), c_0_28]), c_0_31])]), c_0_37])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1062:$i]:(in @ X1062 @ nat=>![X1068:$i]:(in @ X1068 @ nat=>(~((![X1069:$i]:(in @ X1069 @ nat=>(X1062)!=(n_pl @ X1068 @ X1069))=>(X1062)=(X1068)))=>~(![X1070:$i]:(in @ X1070 @ nat=>(X1068)!=(n_pl @ X1062 @ X1070))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz10j]), c_0_24]), c_0_22]), c_0_38]), c_0_39])])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_42, plain, ![X1612:$i, X1613:$i]:(~in @ X1612 @ nat|(~in @ X1613 @ nat|epred18_2 @ X1613 @ X1612)), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_40])])])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ![X1671:$i, X1672:$i]:(in @ esk51_0 @ nat&(in @ esk52_0 @ nat&(((~in @ X1671 @ nat|(esk51_0)!=(n_pl @ esk52_0 @ X1671))&(esk51_0)!=(esk52_0))&(~in @ X1672 @ nat|(esk52_0)!=(n_pl @ esk51_0 @ X1672))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])])])])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_44, plain, ![X751:$i, X761:$i]:(epred18_2 @ X761 @ X751=>~((((X751)!=(X761)=>(![X762:$i]:(in @ X762 @ nat=>(X751)!=(n_pl @ X761 @ X762))=>~(![X763:$i]:(in @ X763 @ nat=>(X761)!=(n_pl @ X751 @ X763)))))=>(((X751)=(X761)=>![X764:$i]:(in @ X764 @ nat=>(X751)!=(n_pl @ X761 @ X764)))=>((~(![X765:$i]:(in @ X765 @ nat=>(X751)!=(n_pl @ X761 @ X765)))=>![X766:$i]:(in @ X766 @ nat=>(X761)!=(n_pl @ X751 @ X766)))=>~((~(![X767:$i]:(in @ X767 @ nat=>(X761)!=(n_pl @ X751 @ X767)))=>(X751)!=(X761)))))))), inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:(epred18_2 @ X4 @ X1|~in @ X1 @ nat|~in @ X4 @ nat), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, in @ esk52_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_47, plain, ![X1828:$i, X1829:$i, X1832:$i, X1833:$i, X1834:$i, X1835:$i]:((((in @ (esk72_2 @ X1828 @ X1829) @ nat|in @ (esk71_2 @ X1828 @ X1829) @ nat|(X1828)=(X1829)|~epred18_2 @ X1829 @ X1828)&((X1829)=(n_pl @ X1828 @ (esk72_2 @ X1828 @ X1829))|in @ (esk71_2 @ X1828 @ X1829) @ nat|(X1828)=(X1829)|~epred18_2 @ X1829 @ X1828))&((in @ (esk72_2 @ X1828 @ X1829) @ nat|(X1828)=(n_pl @ X1829 @ (esk71_2 @ X1828 @ X1829))|(X1828)=(X1829)|~epred18_2 @ X1829 @ X1828)&((X1829)=(n_pl @ X1828 @ (esk72_2 @ X1828 @ X1829))|(X1828)=(n_pl @ X1829 @ (esk71_2 @ X1828 @ X1829))|(X1828)=(X1829)|~epred18_2 @ X1829 @ X1828)))&(((X1828)!=(X1829)|(~in @ X1832 @ nat|(X1828)!=(n_pl @ X1829 @ X1832))|~epred18_2 @ X1829 @ X1828)&((~in @ X1833 @ nat|(X1828)!=(n_pl @ X1829 @ X1833)|(~in @ X1834 @ nat|(X1829)!=(n_pl @ X1828 @ X1834))|~epred18_2 @ X1829 @ X1828)&(~in @ X1835 @ nat|(X1829)!=(n_pl @ X1828 @ X1835)|(X1828)!=(X1829)|~epred18_2 @ X1829 @ X1828)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_44])])])])])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(epred18_2 @ esk52_0 @ X1|~in @ X1 @ nat), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45, c_0_46])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_49, negated_conjecture, in @ esk51_0 @ nat, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((X1)=(n_pl @ X4 @ (esk72_2 @ X4 @ X1))|(X4)=(n_pl @ X1 @ (esk71_2 @ X4 @ X1))|(X4)=(X1)|~epred18_2 @ X1 @ X4), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_51, negated_conjecture, epred18_2 @ esk52_0 @ esk51_0, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48, c_0_49])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_52, negated_conjecture, (esk51_0)!=(esk52_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_53, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~in @ X1 @ nat|(esk51_0)!=(n_pl @ esk52_0 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_54, plain, ((n_pl @ esk52_0 @ (esk71_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0))=(esk51_0)|(n_pl @ esk51_0 @ (esk72_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0))=(esk52_0)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50, c_0_51]), c_0_52])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_55, plain, ![X1:$i, X4:$i]:((X1)=(n_pl @ X4 @ (esk72_2 @ X4 @ X1))|in @ (esk71_2 @ X4 @ X1) @ nat|(X4)=(X1)|~epred18_2 @ X1 @ X4), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_56, negated_conjecture, ((n_pl @ esk51_0 @ (esk72_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0))=(esk52_0)|~in @ (esk71_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0) @ nat), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53, c_0_54])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_57, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~in @ X1 @ nat|(esk52_0)!=(n_pl @ esk51_0 @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_58, plain, (n_pl @ esk51_0 @ (esk72_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0))=(esk52_0), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55, c_0_51]), c_0_52]), c_0_56])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_59, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ (esk72_2 @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|(X1)=(n_pl @ X4 @ (esk71_2 @ X1 @ X4))|(X1)=(X4)|~epred18_2 @ X4 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_60, negated_conjecture, ~in @ (esk72_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0) @ nat, inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57, c_0_58])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_61, plain, ![X4:$i, X1:$i]:(in @ (esk72_2 @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|in @ (esk71_2 @ X1 @ X4) @ nat|(X1)=(X4)|~epred18_2 @ X4 @ X1), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_62, plain, (n_pl @ esk52_0 @ (esk71_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0))=(esk51_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59, c_0_51]), c_0_52]), c_0_60])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_63, plain, in @ (esk71_2 @ esk51_0 @ esk52_0) @ nat, inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61, c_0_51]), c_0_52]), c_0_60])).
59.32/59.78	thf(c_0_64, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_53, c_0_62]), c_0_63])]), ['proof']).
59.32/59.78	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
59.32/59.78	# Proof object total steps             : 65
59.32/59.78	# Proof object clause steps            : 19
59.32/59.78	# Proof object formula steps           : 46
59.32/59.78	# Proof object conjectures             : 13
59.32/59.78	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 10
59.32/59.78	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
59.32/59.78	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
59.32/59.78	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 22
59.32/59.78	# Proof object generating inferences   : 9
59.32/59.78	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 9
59.32/59.78	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
59.32/59.78	# Parsed axioms                        : 357
59.32/59.78	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
59.32/59.78	# Initial clauses                      : 502
59.32/59.78	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 153
59.32/59.78	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 349
59.32/59.78	# Processed clauses                    : 520
59.32/59.78	# ...of these trivial                  : 10
59.32/59.78	# ...subsumed                          : 23
59.32/59.78	# ...remaining for further processing  : 487
59.32/59.78	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 214
59.32/59.78	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
59.32/59.78	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
59.32/59.78	# Backward-rewritten                   : 10
59.32/59.78	# Generated clauses                    : 4996
59.32/59.78	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 4726
59.32/59.78	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
59.32/59.78	# Paramodulations                      : 4585
59.32/59.78	# Factorizations                       : 0
59.32/59.78	# NegExts                              : 0
59.32/59.78	# Equation resolutions                 : 216
59.32/59.78	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional check models        : 0
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
59.32/59.78	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
59.32/59.78	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
59.32/59.78	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
59.32/59.78	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
59.32/59.78	# Current number of processed clauses  : 431
59.32/59.78	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 162
59.32/59.78	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
59.32/59.78	#    Negative unit clauses             : 40
59.32/59.78	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 226
59.32/59.78	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4550
59.32/59.78	# ...number of literals in the above   : 14379
59.32/59.78	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
59.32/59.78	# Current number of archived clauses   : 10
59.32/59.78	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16637
59.32/59.78	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3433
59.32/59.78	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
59.32/59.78	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6924
59.32/59.78	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 2
59.32/59.78	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 26
59.32/59.78	# BW rewrite match successes           : 6
59.32/59.78	# Condensation attempts                : 0
59.32/59.78	# Condensation successes               : 0
59.32/59.78	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 134065
59.32/59.78	
59.32/59.78	# -------------------------------------------------
59.32/59.78	# User time                : 57.917 s
59.32/59.78	# System time              : 1.411 s
59.32/59.78	# Total time               : 59.328 s
59.32/59.78	# Maximum resident set size: 2184 pages
59.32/59.78	EOF